COST Action Project on the Physics of
Deformation in Amorphous Materials
You are here:
Main page
»
cost_eval1
Main page
Preproposal
Draft Long proposal
Participants
List of questions:
Q.1 RIGHT FOR COST? Is COST the best mechanism for achieving the Action's objectives?
High marks are given to proposals for which COST is the best adapted mechanism.
Lower marks are given otherwise.
(Answered by a value from 1 to 6)
Q.2 PUBLIC UTILITY/SCIENCE Does the proposed Action address real current problems/ scientific issues?
High marks are given to highly exciting and interesting proposals on a very important and/or timely topic.
Lower marks are given otherwise.
(Answered by a value from 1 to 6)
Q.3 INNOVATION Is the proposed Action innovative?
High marks are given to highly innovative proposals.
Lower marks are given otherwise.
(Answered by a value from 1 to 6)
Q.4 IMPACT Would the proposed network make a significant difference in terms of knowledge, capacity building, social impacts, etc?
High marks are given to proposals with high potential impact.
Lower marks are given otherwise.
(Answered by a value from 1 to 6)
Q.5 NETWORKING Are networking aspects well motivated and developed in the proposal?
High marks for proposals that both motivate the need for networking in the field and show how the proposed networking will add value to the current state-of-the-art.
Lower marks are given otherwise.
(Answered by a value from 1 to 6)
Q.6 PRESENTATION Is the proposed Action presented in a clear, rational and understandable way?
High marks for proposals that are presented in a clear, rational and understandable way.
Lower marks are given otherwise.
(Answered by a value from 1 to 6)
Last modified: 2010/12/05 16:55
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license:
Public Domain